Recovering from Churches That Abuse.
Ronald Enroth. Zondervan, Grand Rapids, MI, 1994, 166 pages.
This
is a short book, but the material is concise, readable, useful, and well
referenced. There is an appendix of checklists of factors and forces in
“abusive groups” and in recovery from them. Six pages of footnotes
further document and clarify the book’s content. Enroth is a
sociologist who has written other books on cults and “new religions”
and this book’s format and content attest to his expertise. His
writing style is clear and the development of the subject logical and
well documented. The material reflects a knowledge of the subject and
insight into the cognitive, affective, and spiritual factors involved
in spiritual abuse.
Enroth
uses a case study approach, of men and women who were victimized by
abusive religions. He allows them to “speak their own thoughts and
tell their own stories” which he then “put into narrative form.”
His “primary purpose” was “to describe the processes of recovery,
obstacles encountered,” and “factors that inhibit or retard
recovery” (p. 10). Enroth describes spiritual abuse as “damaging the
central core of who we are,” which then “leaves us spiritually
discouraged and emotionally cut off from the healing love of God.”
Enroth feels that much spiritual abuse is not intentional but occurs
because of narcissistic leaders or those whose enthusiasm or faith
renders them insensitive to human needs. Spiritual abuse is more
destructive when the victim is in a need state (e.g., substance abuse,
depression, desperately seeking help). The abuse is intensified in
legalistic, authoritarian, and “spiritually elite” churches where
rules are rigid and rigidly enforced and independent thought is
prohibited. Social stressors further exacerbate the abused, such as
where members are belittled or shunned if they drop out. Other negative
effects are reinforcement of depression, low self-concept, rejection,
failure, or futility.
Throughout
the book Enroth describes the recovery process for each abused person,
and the methods used. Among the methods is the our-step Wellspring
method: learning to trust again without codependency; process
questionable teachings of the abusive church (“twisted
hermeneutics”); grieving for one’s self; future planning (Wellspring Retreat and Rehabilitation Center
in Albany, Ohio,
specializes in former cult member clients). Ebaugh’s four stages are
also included: questioning commitment; exploring and evaluating
alternatives; deciding to leave; creating the ex-role. In this way, the
book is a helpful reference for comparative postcult recovery.
Of
value to researchers and therapists is the author’s conclusion, after
interviewing victims, consulting with experts in the field, and
reflecting on common factors, that “the road to recovery is different
for each person.” Equally important, abusive religions appear to
always erode self-confidence and self-esteem. Of value to society and
the future is Enroth’s observation that “battered believers” can recover (p. 147), and he offers
examples where abusing religions have, of and by themselves, seen the
error of their ways and reformed themselves. Thus, there is hope for the
individual, the sect, and society.
This
is a useful book and is highly recommended. It contains real-life cases,
their journeys to recovery, a concise review of counseling methods, and
examples of how several abusing sects readjusted to healthier, more
positive practices.