English
Ω 1-Home Conference Ω 2-Program Ω 3-presenters/speakers Ω 4-Fees Ω 5-Ways to Register Ω 6-Facility and Lodging Ω 7-Travel Information Ω 8-Registration Fax/Mail Form
Español
Ω 1-Página Principal del Congreso - Español Ω 2-Programa Ω 3-Ponentes Ω 4-Cuotas de Inscripción y Alojamiento Ω 5-Formas de Inscripción - Español Ω 6-Lugar de Celebración y Alojamientos Ω 7-Información sobre el viaje Ω 8-Formulario de Inscripción Fax/Correo - Español
Français
Ω 1-page d'accueil du congrès - Français Ω 2-Programme Ω 3-présentateurs Ω 4-Frais Ω 5-Pour l’inscription - Français Ω 6-Services - Français Ω 7-Renseignements généraux de voyage - Français Ω 8-Formulaire d’inscription par télécopie ou par courrier
Prevalence: A Review
of Empirical Research in the U. S. A.
Edward A. Lottick, M.D.
The following questions are relevant to prevalence:
§
At any given time, how many cults are there? Are they increasing
or decreasing?
§
At any given time, how many adherents are there? Increasing or
decreasing?
§
At any given time, how many former adherents are there? Increasing
or decreasing?
The relevance of the following studies to these questions
will be explored:
§
Bird and Reimer, 1982: Surveys of adult populations of San
Francisco and Montreal yielded 20% participation in new religious or
para-religious movements.
§
Hulet, 1984: Cult Awareness Network compilation of over 2000
groups about which they received inquires.
§
Bloomgarden and Langone, 1984: 3% and 1.5% of high school students
in two suburbs of Boston said they were cult members.
§
Zimbardo and Hartley, 1985: Survey of a random sample of 1000 San
Francisco Bay area high school students yielded 3% reporting membership in
cultic groups.
§
Hart, 1989: Roper survey of teenagers and young adults yielded 1%
reporting they had joined a religious cult.
§
ICR Survey Research Group for AFF, 1993: yielded 1% saying they
had been involved in a cult or what others might consider a cult.
§
Lottick, 1993: Survey of 5400 physicians with 1500 responding
found 2.2% reporting having had family member involved in cultic group with cult
clearly defined as a noxious group: "a group which violates the rights of its
members, harms them through abusive techniques of mind control, and
distinguishes itself from a normal social or religious group by subjecting its
members to physical, mental, or financial deprivation or deception to keep them
in the group." Also overall 21% had either personal or professional experience
and 16.8% had only professional experience with a noxious group.
§
Lottick, 2004: Survey of 3000 psychology professionals with 700
responding, probed awareness of "cults" which were defined as "adverse to
adherent's long-run best interests." Statistical tabulation pending.
|